The dispute between the old and new constitutional parties over the meaning of internal and complete independence (July 31 – August 8, 1954): A political or legal debate?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58298/832025808Keywords:
Foundations, Independence, Declaration, Press debateAbstract
Our research presents the political and ideological foundations used by the two Destourian parties, the archeo and the neo " executive commission/political bureau", in their dispute over the sense of internal and total independence following the declaration of the French government the Radical, Pierre Mendès-France, on July 31, 1954, before the bey of Tunis, Mohamed Lamine.It analyzes the procedural consequences of this dispute regarding the success or failure of the first negotiation process of the government of Tahar Ben Ammar
" August 8, 1954 - September 17, 1955". Drawing its elements from the journalistic debate which took place between the two leaders, Habib Bourguiba, president of the Neo-Destour, and Salah Farhat, secretary general of the Archéo-Destour, and Charles Saumagne, honorary director of the Tunisian administration, through articles published on the question in the newspapers La Presse , le Monde, and reserves made by the secretary general Salah Ben Youssef, with regard to the Mendès-France declaration " August 4, 1954" and his opposition to the French-Tunisian conventions concluded on June 3, 1955.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 مراد المولاهي
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution (CC BY) 4.0 international license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, and to alter, transform, or build upon the material, including for commercial use, providing the original author is credited.
