(The Role and Impact of Soft Power in Managing Political Crises)"Assessment of Kurdish Media in Crisis Management Between the Region and Baghdad,From the Perspective of a Group of Academics in Kurdistan"
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58298/832025787Keywords:
soft power, crisis, negotiations, media, social mediaAbstract
Soft power is considered one of the fundamental pillars in managing various crises in the era of globalization, due to its intellectual and philosophical content that aligns with the spirit of the age. It involves precise identification and deep diagnosis of crises that arise between the related parties, by adopting sound reasoning and enlightened thinking to contain and control crises without exacerbating them, based on logical, realistic, and rational accepted principles and foundations.
A crisis is a product of society, rooted and growing based on a set of subjective and objective data as a tangible, realistic phenomenon based on action and reaction, whether deliberate or arbitrary. Therefore, how to deal with the crisis and ways to confront and manage it is considered a roadmap leading to two paths and no third option: either towards the resolution of the crisis or towards its explosion.
The relationship between the Kurdistan Region and the central government in Baghdad, which is the subject of our research, is a relationship based on crisis and crisis management on one hand, and crisis creation and escalation on the other. Therefore, the relationship between them can be considered thorny, complex, confused, and crisis-ridden, as a result of the lack of trust between the two parties, and the buying of time in order to forget and not demand those rights by the Kurdistan Region, as the central government in Baghdad believes.
The media, in all its various and diverse forms, plays a fundamental and pivotal role in creating a suitable environment for managing the crisis between the two parties in order to bring their viewpoints closer together, search for common points, and avoid stirring up grudges and exacerbating the crisis to reach a deadlock. This matter requires a balanced media policy compatible with soft power, both in terms of tactics and strategy, in order to safeguard interests and achieve the desired goals.
References
Charles. Lerche, (1969), Concept of International Politics, Prentice-Hall. Inc., New Jersey, USA.
Hans J. Morgenthau, (1967), Political Among Nations, 4th, Ed, N.Y. Alfred Knoph.
John Wien Brenner, (2004), Soft Power and Hard Power approach in U.S. Foreign Policy: A Case study in Latin America. Florida, Orlando.
Joseph. S. Nye, (2004), Soft Power: The Means to Succeed in World Politics, New York, Basic Book.
Joseph S. Nye, (2011), The Future of Power, (New York: Public Affairs
Person. C.M. and Clear. J.A, (1998), Reframing Crisis Management, Academy of Management Review.
Roger Fisher. Elizabeth Koperlman, (1996), Andrea Schneider. Beyond Machiavelli: Tools for coping with conflict. Penguin group. New York.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 شيرزاد سليمان عبدالله

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution (CC BY) 4.0 international license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, and to alter, transform, or build upon the material, including for commercial use, providing the original author is credited.




